Search published articles


Showing 4 results for Safayi


Volume 2, Issue 4 (3-2018)
Abstract

In this article with descriptive-analytical method and comparative approach to learn about their thoughts. Studies indicate that similar definitions of human identity and nature of the world in their poems are provided, which can be due to their geographical and gender proximity; some of these definitions about identity include: efflorescence and freshness, captivity, dejection and divinity.with this difference that Forrough poems, unlike Nazik divided into two periods. In terms of Forrough and Nazik, life sometimes is prison and Sometimes absurd and worthless. Finally Forrough unlike Nazik, considers meaning of life a series of daily actions with claimed that it is unknown.

Volume 3, Issue 2 (No.2 (Tome 6)- 2015)
Abstract

  Persian and Arabic literatures have had tight link and very similarity across the history. Both literatures in the contemporary era have very similarity and isotropy due to passing the common transformations and experiences, as well as the closeness of conceptual and literary trends of the poets. Thus, in our literary society, comparision of artistic masterpice of both literatures is one of the important fields of research concerning to comparative literature.  In the present study, we aim to study, using descriptive-analytic method and based on American school in comparative literature, on the both famous poems of "Crucified man" by "Shamloo" and "Messiah after crucifying" by Badr Shaker-Al-Sayyab, both of which deal with regeneration of the final part of Messiah’s life. For this reason, we have tried to, in addition of to conceptual and literary closeness of Shamloo and Sayyab, representing the place of Messiah myth, analyse both of the mentioned poems in terms of takeing advantage of "Messiah myth", admissibility structure, method of narrative, and symbolism, and also taking advantage from repetition music.  

Volume 7, Issue 7 (No.7 (Tome 35), (Articles in Persian) 2016)
Abstract

The Leader's Letters have always some special features to be analyzed in the frame work of critical discourse analysis. One of the valuable letters is the 28th letter of the Imam Ali's Nahj Al-balāghe having special place among the letters of Imam Ali. In principle, this letter manifests legitimate discourse of the Imam. The main question of this article is that how is it possible to investigate the relationship among the different linguistic layers within this discourse? Furthermore, how this legitimate discourse of Imam can be shaped by these linguistic and discursive selections? And finally how it can fight with the opponent discourse (Muāwiyah)?
Our assumption is that in this letter, Imam to by perpetuating and promoting his legitimacy and combating with the opposite discourse, Imam makes specific choices of linguistic possibilities and tries to gain the attention of the audience to his policy. To explore this, this article uses the Halliday's functional grammar theoretical framework to study the Imam's letter based on three metafunctions of this approach.
These metafunctions are ideational, interpersonal and textual .The results indicated that the legitimate discourse of the Imam, in order to stabilize and promote itself against opposite discourse, spreads the concept of "Us and Them" in the letter by making appropriate and specific choices from linguistic devices particularly in the application of relational and material processes and modality. Also, the textual function enhances previous metafunctions in the way to guaranty the coherence of the discourse in terms of legitimacy.
 

Volume 10, Issue 45 (August and September 2022)
Abstract

Research Background
In order to study kinship structures, especially kinship structures in myths, Iranian researchers have benefited a lot from Strauss theories. For instance, Rouh-Al-Amini (1991) carries a study on social marriage structures in Shahnameh based on structural anthropology and Strauss theory, even though there is not an emphatic position of exchange theory in his article. Sattari and his colleagues (2006) have benefited from structural anthropology in their analysis of kinship in Iranian myths, and their study emphasizes on binary oppositions in Strauss’s thinking. In this article, different ways of choosing spouse based on binary oppositions are well shown, although the topic of exchange and merchandising women have not been mentioned.
Apart from studies based on anthropological theories, there are other studies which have been investigating different kinds of marriages without considering any particular theory. For instance, Bagheri and Mirzaiyan (2016) have studied the reasons to get married, obstacles along the way and characteristics of men and women in marriages, and tried to find the ways that marriages have been established in folktales, without having any particular anthropological framework.
Theoretical framework, goals, and questions
Folktales are rich sources for studying cultural and social characteristics of societies. Beyond entertainment, they indirectly transmit values and cultural beliefs to children and young adults. Marriage ceremonies are important part of every culture and they appear boldly in folktales.
Claude Levi-Strauss, the father of structural anthropology, claims that all marriages are based on exchange. From his point of view, men from different groups would hand over women from their group to men in other groups and instead, receive women from them, and that is how marriage took place and eventually the core of social life was shaped. He also points out that women were not only traded for other women, but also for land, wealth, food and even respect. In his opinion, marriage follows the exogamy rules and that is exactly due to those rules that communication between today’s men and great societies is guaranteed, otherwise through endogamy rules, we would be witnessing just close families and the end of social life as we know it (Levi-Strauss, 1969, pp. 478-480).
This article is aimed at posing the question that based on which exchanges, marriage in Iranian folktales takes place? What were women exchanged for? And how and under which concepts the nature of exchanges in marriage got hidden?
This study has been carried out after investigating more than a hundred tale and different marriages taken place in Iranian tales written by Sobhi Mohtadi, Samad Behrangi, Anjavi Shirazi and Mashdi Galin Khanum stories. The study reveals the exchange basis of marriage and tries to analyze the fact that despite all the huge differences in ceremonies, characters and social status, in a lot of cases the structure is the same where the primary core is based on a trade.


Conclusion
As Strauss has stated, the social structuralism in different societies follows a common set of rules and regulations, exchange marriage rules being one of them. Analyzing Iranian tales shows that despite the diversity in exchange rules, they are present in most marriages. Women are traded for treatment, freedom, security, knowledge and education. Wealth too is a very obvious means of exchange in most tales. In some of the stories, women themselves have effective roles and set some conditions for their future spouses, but in most cases, they are treated as merchandise and are offered to other men by the men in their own tribe (usually the father). It is true that real life does not follow the patterns in tales, but the world of folktales is a reflector of the mind of narrators. Thus, it should be said that the exchange rules in marriage has become an accepted fact in Iranian mentality and the folklore is a clear reflection of it.
References
Levi-Strauss, C. (1969). The elementary structures of kinship (translated into English by J.  Harle Bell and J. R. von Sturmer). Beacon Press.


Page 1 from 1