Search published articles
Showing 3 results for Khojastehpour
Volume 4, Issue 2 (Summer 2020)
Abstract
Abstract
Research subject: The need to increase agricultural production in proportion to population growth and water crisis management requires initiatives that can increase the quantity and quality of crops by using soil moisture storage methods while preserving the environment. In this study, the effect of different wt. % of Thermoplastic starch (TPS) with maleic anhydride (MA) as compatibilizer and nanoclay (15A) on gel content and mechanical properties of Polylactic acid (PLA) and blends of Linear low-density polyethylene/ Low-density polyethylene (LLDPE / LDPE) was evaluated.
Research approach: Here, 0, 10, 20 and 30 wt. % TPS were added to the blends of LLDPE/LDPE (20/80) and also PLA. Independent parameters in the experimental design were wt. % of TPS, basic polymer type that was PLA or TPS and aging test. For dependent parameters were considered gel content, tensile strength, elongation at break and elastic modulus. Experiments were designed in General Full Factorial Design and performed in three replications.
Main results: Gel content in LLDPE/LDPE blends increased with the addition of TPS and decreased for PLA blends. The gel content change range for experimental samples before and after the aging test was between 10 to 21 and 2 to 5 percent, respectively. Tensile strength and elongation at break were reduced by adding TPS in both series of compounds before aging test. But this reducing rate was less in the 20 wt. % of TPS. The values of tensile strength and elongation at break were: 12 to 19 MPa and 50 to 350 percent, respectively. These values changed after the aging test between 7 and 11 MPa and from zero to 5 percent, respectively.
Keywords: biodegradability, low density polyethylene, poly lactic acid, thermoplastic starch.
Volume 6, Issue 22 (Summer 2013)
Abstract
دیر زمانی نیست که استقبال فزاینده¬ای را از ادبیات تطبیقی در ایران شاهد هستیم. این استقبال گرچه ممکن است از برخی جهات اتّفاقی فرخنده به شمار آید اما نیک که بنگریم چندان خوشایند نیست. متاسفانه در کشور ما روی¬آوردن به ادبیات تطبیقی بدون درک صحیح مبانی و چارچوب¬های نظری آن این رشته را با بحرانی جدی رو¬به¬رو کرده¬است. بدفهمی¬هایی که واژه «تطبیقی» ایجاد کرده باعث شده است که گاه این رشته صرفاً به عنوان یکی از «دانش¬های تطبیقی» از جمله فلسفه تطبیقی، زبان¬شناسی تطبیقی و... شناخته شود. از سوی دیگر به دلیل ناآشنایی با مکاتب گوناگون این رشته و در نظرگرفتن آن صرفا به عنوان مقایسه دو ادبیات ملی، «پژوهش¬هایی زیر چتر نام ادبیات تطبیقی انجام گرفته که هیچ¬گونه قرابت و سنخیتی با ماهیت آن ندارد» (انوشیروانی 1389:36). نوشتار پیش¬رو به بررسی مقاله «بررسی تطبیقی شعر و اندیشه تی. اس. الیوت و احمد شاملو بر اساس مولفه های مدرنیته» به قلم حسن اکبری بیرق و نرگس سنایی که در شماره 4 (پیاپی 12) نشریه پژوهش¬های زبان و ادبیات تطبیقی چاپ شده است، می¬پردازد.
Volume 6, Issue 22 (Summer 2013)
Abstract
Clarifying New Historicism through a Critical Look at the Papers Applying the Approach in Iran As an approach to the relationship between literature and history, new historicism has been highly received in Iranian academia. This reception was concomitant with some misunderstandings. A part of these misunderstandings is the result of the elusive nature of the approach. Moreover, lack of theoretical works in Iran has led to serious problems. Even though this approach is not a very recent one, it is a novelty in Iran. One of the reasons behind this novelty is lack of sufficient theoretical source in the field. A glance on the practice of new historicism reveals the interest in the field along with the lack of sufficient theoretical source has led to some misunderstanding. The present paper tries to correct some of the misunderstandings surrounding this approach. Keywords: New Historicism, History, Literature, Pathology, Power, Discourse, Greenblatt, Foucault.