Selective Mediating Role of Quality of Work Life on Health Worker Performance in Decentralized Systems | ||
| Health Education and Health Promotion | ||
| Article 18, Volume 14, Issue 1, Winter 2026, Pages 139-145 PDF (1.48 M) | ||
| Document Type: Descriptive & Survey | ||
| DOI: 10.58209/hehp.14.1.139 | ||
| Authors | ||
| M. Yuda Pratama* 1; I. Yustina1; N. Nurmaini1; Z. Zulkarnain2; G. Silaban1; E. Mutiara1; N.L. Lubis1; S. Sumardiyono3 | ||
| 1Department of Public Health, Faculty of Public Health, University of Northern Sumatra, Medan, Indonesia | ||
| 2Department of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Northern Sumatra, Indonesia | ||
| 3Department of Occupational Safety and Health, Faculty of Medicine, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Aims: This study analyzed whether quality of work life consistently mediates the relationships between organizational commitment, healthy work environment, motivational climate, career development, and health worker job performance in decentralized primary care systems. Instrument & Methods: This explanatory quantitative study used validated measures to assess organizational commitment, workplace quality, motivation, career progression, quality of work life, and job performance among 320 primary healthcare workers in the local government of Aceh, Indonesia. Indirect and direct relationships were examined using partial least squares structural equation modeling. Findings: Quality of work life significantly mediated the effects of motivational climate (β=0.147; t=3.467; p=0.001) and career development (β=0.105; t=2.974; p=0.003) on job performance, but did not mediate the effects of organizational commitment (β=0.01; t=1.106; p=0.269) or healthy work environment (β=0.006; t=0.86; p=0.39). Healthy work environment (β=0.216; t=6.279; p<0.001) and organizational commitment (β=0.423; t=6.569; p<0.001) significantly influenced job performance independently of quality of work life, while motivational climate had a marginal direct effect (β=0.115; t=1.878; p=0.06). The paths from organizational commitment (β=0.035; t=1.227; p=0.22) and healthy work environment (β=0.021; t=0.895; p=0.371) to quality of work life were not significant. Conclusion: Quality of work life improves health professionals’ performance in decentralized health systems by selectively mediating the effects of motivational climate and career development, while organizational commitment and health environment influence performance through other direct pathways. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Quality of Work Life; Job Performance; Healthcare Workers; Health Systems Plan | ||
| References | ||
|
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 561 PDF Download: 271 |
||
| Number of Journals | 45 |
| Number of Issues | 2,250 |
| Number of Articles | 25,489 |
| Article View | 32,705,719 |
| PDF Download | 19,747,344 |