Association of Peers' Influence, Home Food Environment and Out of Home Food Environment with Obesity in School-Aged Adolescents in Iran | ||
| Health Education and Health Promotion | ||
| Article 5, Volume 10, Issue 3, 2022, Pages 451-457 PDF (569.87 K) | ||
| Document Type: Original Research | ||
| Authors | ||
| Z. Sadri1; S.B. Panahande2; Sh. Faghih* 3 | ||
| 1School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Nutrition, School of Health and Nutrition, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Aims: Our study aimed to find the association between general and central obesity with peers influence, home food environment, and out-of-home food environment in Iran. Material & Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 15- to 18-year-old students in Yasuj, Iran selected using a stratified random sampling method. A demographic questionnaire was used and a 37-item questionnaire was used to assess the information about the peers' influence, home food environment, and out-of-home food environment. Weight, height, and waist circumference were measured for all participants. Body mass index and waist-to-height ratio were calculated. Findings: Information from 241 participants including 120 girls and 121 boys were included in the analysis. The mean age of the participants was 16.43±0.88. None of the variables of peers influence, home food environment, and out-of-home food environment showed a significant association with anthropometric indices. Conclusion: In our study, none of the peers' influence, home food environment and out of home food environment, could justify the participants' obesity. It seems that studies with larger sample sizes and more demographic diversity are needed. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Obesity(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68009765); adolescents(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68000293); Food Quality (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68063427); iran (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/68007492 ) | ||
| Full Text | ||
|
Introduction Food is one of the most basic needs of human society that affects the health of society from birth to old age [1, 2]. Childhood, and adolescence are two key periods in the formation of eating habits, and many of the food patterns that form during this time are less likely to change later in life [3]. Proper nutrition, and a proper diet plan are necessary conditions to maintain the health of children, and adolescents, especially at school age [4, 5]. Children are at risk for complications such as iron deficiency anemia, obesity, gastrointestinal disorders, short-term tooth decay, chronic, and dangerous cardiovascular disease, cancer, stroke, and long-term diabetes as a result of poor diet patterns [6-9]. Among these complications, obesity is a global problem, and one of the major health problems in developed, and developing countries [7]. According to the report WHO, the prevalence of childhood obesity in the world is increasing, from 4.2% in 1990 to 6.7% in 2010 [10, 11]. Based on a meta-analysis, the prevalence of obesity among Iranian students aged 6-18 years was 5.82% [12]. The obesity epidemic has been associated with lifestyle changes, including changes in eating habits in the home, school, community, and other environments [13-15]. In Iran, as in many developing countries, the food habits of adolescents have shifted from traditional foods, and simple snacks to high-calorie foods with insufficient nutritional value [16, 17]. Some possible factors influencing the change in adolescents' eating habits include peer influence as well as home food environment, and out-of-home food environment [18-20]. The home food environment can be a source of both positive, and negative behaviors by providing a variety of foods [18, 19]. Home plays a significant role in shaping behaviors that affect the health of both adults, and children [13, 18]. Various studies have shown a positive relationship between the availability of vegetables, and fruits at home, and the intake of these foods by family members [13, 19]. The food environment of the home can be affected by various cultural, social, political, and economic aspects, which in turn affects adolescents’ dietary behaviors and the development of obesity. There has been an association between access to sweets, chips, and salty snacks in children as well as access to fast food among adolescents with access to healthy food at home [13]. However, studies show that although families play a strong role in eating behaviors, as children grow older; they spend most of their time among their friends, and the influence of peers’ on their lifestyle plays a more important role [14, 21] The peers’ influence on children's use of alcohol, tobacco, and drug abuse has been studied and confirmed in previous studies [22, 23]. The peers’ influence on adolescent food choices has received less attention [24]. An Australian study found that adolescents are similar to their friends in choosing meals outside the home [19]. In general, there are few studies on the role of peers in children's food consumption. Easy access to restaurants and fast foods may also reduce the consumption of healthy foods, resulting in poor nutrition, and increased prevalence of obesity [20]. Several studies have shown that frequent consumption of food outside the home, especially in restaurants or fast foods, is associated with weight gain, and BMI [18]. Frequent consumption of meals from non-family sources, such as fast foods, is involved in weight change [25]. parents who prepared at least one dinner a week from these sources were significantly more likely to have they are overweight, and obese studies have found that a large number of fast-food restaurants and a small number of grocery stores around the house are associated with higher rates of obesity among individuals [25, 26]. Even the risk of obesity decreases when people are in closer contact with supermarkets rather than larger stores [25]. Considering the increasing rate of obesity in Iranian children, and adolescents [12], Understanding the factors affecting obesity, and their nutrition is an important step in developing strategies to prevent obesity, and non-communicable diseases in adulthood. To date, no study has been conducted to investigate the impact of peers, home food environment, and out-of-home food environment on obesity in school-aged adolescents in Iran so this study was designed to investigate the association between peers’ influence, home food environment, and out-of-home food environment with anthropometric indices. Material & Methods The study was a cross-sectional study, performed on 241 high school students aged 15 to 18 years. The study population is all high school students in Yasuj who are 15 to 18 years old (61 high schools). The sample was selected by multi-stage cluster sampling method so that all high schools in Yasuj were listed. Then 10 schools were randomly selected. Then, within each school, one class from each educational grade was randomly selected and entered into the study. To determine the required sample size, the formula n≈ 2𝜎2 (𝑍1 - 𝛼 / 2 ⁄ + 𝑍1 − 𝛽) 2 / d2. Where d=3, σ=11, and β=0.80 with type I error of 5%. Inclusion criteria included living in Yasuj city, not having any situation that affects the participants’ diet, and not suffering from any diseases. The participant that not complete the questionnaire, and did not consent to participate in the study was excluded. Students who participated in the study completed two questionnaires. The first questionnaire was demographic information including age, sex, educational grade, parents' education, household income, family size, and student's birth rank. The second questionnaire was designed by the researcher which included peers’ influence, home food environment, and out-of-home food environment information. Initially, to design a questionnaire, texts, and articles that had an impact on peers, home environment, and outdoor environment were examined. Considering that no similar study was found in Iran, 20 samples selected were included in the study, and interviewed. After the researcher achieved information saturation, the points of view collected by the two nutritionists were reviewed and supplemented. Finally, the item bank was prepared based on the collected information. The prepared items were given to the expert methodologist to identify the items that convey the concepts better. In the end, 37 items in the form of three domains remained in the questionnaire. The content validity of the questionnaire was reviewed, and confirmed by 4 experts (2 nutritionists, one health education specialist, and one public health specialist). The reliability of the questionnaire was also calculated (Cronbach's alpha 0.75 ). The minimum score for the home food environment domain was 9, and the maximum was 45, so the higher the score, the better the food environment of the home. For the peer influence domain, the maximum score was 97, the minimum was 20, and the higher score indicated the greater impact of peers, also the out-of-home food environment had a maximum score of 13, and a minimum of 3, the higher score indicated the healthier out-of-home food environment. The information of both questionnaires was collected by two trained interviewers. The study complied with the edicts of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences ethics committee. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Participants’ weight was measured in light clothes, and without shoes with an OMRON scale model BS-05 with an accuracy of 100 grams. To measure the height, a measuring tape was used, while the participant was standing next to the wall without shoes. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the weight (Kg) divided by the square of height (m2) [27]. Waist Circumference was measured above the ridge, and under the last gear using a non-stretchable tape to the nearest 0.1cm. Waist to height ratio (WHtR) was also calculated and cut points of 0.48, and 0.49 were applied for girls, and boys, respectively, so that numbers higher than 0.48 in girls, and higher than 0.49 in boys indicate obesity [28]. Mean and standard deviation were used to describe quantitative variables, and numbers and percentages were used for qualitative variables. To examine the correlation between the variables, the Pearson correlation coefficient was used [29]. The association between BMI, and some of the characteristics of the participants including age, gender, birth rank, high school grade, family size, economic status, education of the parents as well as home food environment, peers’ influence, and out-of-home food environment was assessed using simple, and multiple linear regression. BMI was considered a dependent variable while the characteristics of the participant were considered independent variables. Variables whose significance level was less than 0.2 in simple linear regression, were selected to enter multiple linear regression [30]. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Findings A total of 241 students, including 120 girls, and 121 boys, entered the study. Participants' mean age was 16.43±0.88 years (girls: 16.51±0.83; boys: 16.34±0.92). Most of the participants were the first child in the family (31.2%). 51% of the participants had a family size of 3 to 5 people. Most participants had moderate economic status (54.6%). In terms of parents' education level, in fathers, the highest percentage of education level (48.1%) was related to pre-university education level, and higher, while in mothers the highest percentage was related to primary level with 36.5%. Other demographic characteristics of the participants by gender are shown in Table 1. Table 1) Demographic characteristics of the participants Table 2 shows the anthropometric characteristics of the participants. Based on the waist to height ratio, 8.3% of girls, and 5.8% of boys were in the group of central obesity. According to the BMI categorize, 18.3% of girls, and 12.4 % of boys were overweight. Also, 10.9% of girls and 7.4% of boys were obese, and 85 (70.8%) of girls and 97 (80.2%) of boys were normal. There was no difference between girls and boys for any of the variables (Table 2). Table 2) Anthropometric characteristics, Home food effect, Out of home food effect, and peers’ effect on the participants (Mean±SD) The correlation between home food environment with weight, waist circumference, and BMI was not significant. Also, peers’ influence and out-of-home food environment did not have a significant correlation with weight, BMI, and waist circumference (Table 3). Table3) Correlation between weight, waist circumference, and BMI with Home food effect, Peers’ effect, and Out of home food effect in adolescents Table 4) Association of BMI with demographic characteristics, home food effect, peers’ effect, and out-of-home food effect in Univariable, and multiple linear regression models A univariate model was used to predict the BMI variable based on other variables. The univariate model showed that age and sex are potential predictors of BMI as it was greater in older age adolescents, also in girls compared to boys. In the multiple models, the only significant variable was sex, as the BMI was significantly higher in girls than boys adjusted for other variables (Table 4). Other variables did not show a significant association with BMI. Discussion This study examined the association between peers’ influence, home food environment, and out-of-home food environment with obesity. Our study showed that the mean variables of height, weight, and BMI in boys are significantly higher than in girls, which is consistent with other studies in this age group [31, 32]. In a study conducted in Isfahan in 2014, the average weight of girls aged 15 to 18 was 53.2, and for boys 59.3, which is lower than our study. The average height in the study mentioned in both boys, and girls is lower than in our study. In that study, BMI was reported to be 20.6 for boys aged 15 to 18, and 20.9 for girls [31], while participants in our study had higher BMI (22.8, and 21.40 in girls, and boys, respectively) which was significantly higher in girls than boys. In the study conducted in Turkey, the average weight of girls is 58.35, and boys is 67.75, and their average height is very close to our study numbers (162.64 in girls, and 173.73 in boys). Also, the BMI reported in the Turkish study is similar to the numbers obtained in our study [32]. In our study, WHtR was not significantly different between girls, and boys (mean 0.37±0.72), and only 8.3% of girls, and 5.8% of boys were in the obese group based on this index. The average obtained for this index in our study is lower than other studies conducted in Iran, and other countries [28, 32]. In a study in Turkey, the mean WHtR was 0.43 in girls, and 0.45 in boys [32]. The study included students aged 16 to 17 years, whose average age was higher than our study, which could justify the higher numbers. In the Caspian-v study in Iran in the age group of 15 to 18 years, 22.7% of boys, and 21.6% of girls had a WHtR index higher than 0.5 [28], which is higher than the percentages obtained in our study. The reason for this discrepancy is the different population. Our study is on the population of Yasuj with Specific ethnicity while the Caspian study is based on a large population of children, and adolescents of different ethnicities. In our study, there was no association between the home food environments with anthropometric indices. An American study of the adult population found that having a variety of fruits, and vegetables available at home was associated with a lower chance of obesity, and overweight; however watching TV while eating in the family was associated with a higher chance of being overweight, and obese [33]. Also, a study on 12- to 15-year-old adolescents found that mothers play an important role in their children's eating behaviors. Mothers also play an important role as food providers. Consumption of high-energy fluids, sugary snacks, and eating outside by mothers was directly related to the consumption of these foods by their children [19]. The reason why our study did not find an association between home food environments, and obesity could be due to a homogeneous community where household food patterns are similar. Another reason for the inconsistency of the results of our study with others is that the questionnaire we used did not ask questions about watching TV while eating, and the type of food consumed by parents. Our questionnaire included questions about consuming carbonated beverages or snacks, sugary drinks, lemonade, or energy drinks at home, Also storage of chips, puffs, and sweet drinks, and their availability at home. We measured the peer influence by asking questions about talking to friends or peers about eating sweets, fast food, sugary, and energy drinks, eating fruit, and consuming milk. They were also asked about encouraging or forbidding peers’ to eat healthy or unhealthy foods. Our results showed no association between peer influence and obesity. Some studies [34-36] have shown that peers’ influence was negligible, but another study [37] found that peers’ have a significant effect on skeptics' adolescent eating behaviors. The results of Mir et al.'s study showed a significant positive association between the behaviors of friends, individuals in sports associations, and fast food consumption [38]. Studies on peer influence in the world, and Iran have received less attention, and limited studies conducted in this field have conflicting results. There was no association between out-of-home food environment and anthropometric indicators. By increasing the choice opportunities for consumers such as increasing access to fast foods, a small percentage of young people, and adults receive healthy nutritional recommendations, which leads to a higher percentage of obesity. Children tended to receive more energy when eating in restaurants, which could be due to the high volume of food, the variety of foods, and the high energy density of restaurants [39, 40]. In other studies it was shown that neighborhoods, especially urban, and rural areas, affect adolescent eating behavior, so that young rural people have healthier eating behaviors than urban people [41, 42]. In fact, they get more vegetables, and less crunchy, and sweet foods, which can be related to the level of education, tradition, culture, food prices, and economic deprivation in that neighborhood. A possible reason for the lack of a meaningful association could be the developing urban community of Yasuj city, and the small size of this city because everyone has equal access to supermarkets. Also, this study was conducted only in urban communities, and if the study was conducted simultaneously in rural areas, it would lead to different results. One of the strengths of this study is to assess all the mentioned variables with a variety of anthropometric indicators simultaneously. Another strength of this study was that for the first time in Iran, it examined, and described the peers’ influence on adolescent obesity. One of the limitations of the study is using a small, and homogenous study population. Conclusion Obesity in adolescents aged 15 to 18 years is affected by a wide range of lifestyle factors. In our study, peers’ influence, home food environment, and out-of-home food environment were examined. Although none of them had a significant relationship with obesity due to study limitations, more attention was paid to choosing friends, and peers, having a healthy eating environment at home and accessing healthy foods at home, which reduces the consumption of fast foods, and unhealthy foods outside the home. It seems that studies with larger sample sizes and more demographic diversity are needed to determine the role of these three variables. Acknowledgments: We appreciate all the students and their families who participated in the study. We are grateful for the education administration, and the school administrators who allowed the study to take place. Ethical Permissions: This article was approved by the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences ethics committee (Project number: IR.SUMS.REC.1397.94) Conflicts of Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Authors’ Contributions: Sadri Z (First Author), Introduction Writer/Main Researcher (34%); Panahande SB (Second Author), Methodologist/Assistant Researcher (33%); Faghih Sh (Third Author), Assistant Researcher/Statistical Analyst (33%) Funding/Support: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study is supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. | ||
| References | ||
|
| ||
|
Statistics Article View: 25 PDF Download: 22 |
||
| Number of Journals | 45 |
| Number of Issues | 2,171 |
| Number of Articles | 24,674 |
| Article View | 24,436,495 |
| PDF Download | 17,551,440 |