New species and records of spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) from Ecuador

New species and records of spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) from Ecuador

Alireza Zamani

Zoological Museum, Biodiversity Unit, FI-20014 University of Turku, Turku 20500, Finland. 

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8084-9666   

Yuri M. Marusik

Institute for Biological Problems of the North FEB RAS, Magadan, Russia [1]; Altai State University, Barnaul, Russia [2]; Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa [3].

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4499-5148

ABSTRACT. New taxonomic and faunistic data on spiders of Ecuador are provided, based on a small set of previously unstudied specimens collected at Tiputini Biodiversity Station in Orellana. These specimens belong to five species in three families: Anapistula tiputiana sp. n. (♀; Symphytognathidae) and Pseudanapis yasunica sp. n. (♂; Anapidae) are described as new to science, and the hersiliids Neotama obatala Rheims & Brescovit, 2004, Ypypuera crucifera (Vellard, 1924) and Y. vittata (Simon, 1887) are newly recorded in Ecuador. Illustrations are provided for all treated species.

Keywords: Amazonia, Anapidae, Hersiliidae, Orellana, Symphytognathidae, Tiputini, Yasuní National Park

Citation: Zamani, A. & Marusik, Y.M. (2024) New species and records of spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) from Ecuador. Journal of Insect Biodiversity and Systematics, 10 (4), 693–702.

INTRODUCTION

More than 900 species in 54 families of spiders are currently known from Ecuador (Dupérré, 2023). Despite being only the ninth largest country in South America and occupying merely 1% of the area of this region, the araneofauna of Ecuador is perhaps the most extensively studied on the continent in terms of the number of species per unit area of the country, and ranks 69^th amongst all countries worldwide (Zamani et al., 2022; Dupérré, 2023). Nevertheless, the diversity of Ecuadorian spiders remains far from completely known, and new species and records are found rather regularly (e.g., Dupérré & Tapia, 2023). Recently, we had the opportunity to examine a small set of previously unstudied spider specimens, collected at Tiputini Biodiversity Station in Orellana, eastern Ecuador, during 5–7 of February, 1999. Despite the small size of the collection (only seven specimens), it was found to contain two species new to science and three species new to Ecuador, which are described and reported in this paper.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Photographs of specimens and their copulatory organs were obtained using an Olympus^® Camedia
E-520 camera attached to an Olympus^® SZX16 stereomicroscope. Digital images of different focal planes were stacked with Helicon Focus™ 8.1.1. Illustrations of macerated epigynes were made after digesting tissues off in a 10% KOH aqueous solution. Leg segments were measured on the dorsal side. Measurements of legs are listed as: total (femur, patella, tibia, metatarsus, tarsus). All measurements are given in millimetres.

Depository. USNM – National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

RESULTS

Taxonomic hierarchy

Class Arachnida Lamarck, 1801

Order Araneae Clerck, 1757

Family Anapidae Simon, 1895

Genus Pseudanapis Simon, 1905

Type species. Aanapis parocula Simon, 1899 from Sumatra.

Comments. The genus comprises 11 described species distributed across various regions, including Southeast Asia (3 species), Sub-Saharan Africa (2 species), Papua New Guinea (1 species), and the Neotropics (4 species), and it exhibits a wide distribution in the Pacific, with one species introduced to several countries in Europe. Despite its unusual disjunctive distribution, all species known by males exhibit very similar male palps: with two processes extending from the femur, a large patella widening distally, and a very small tibia (smaller than the patella and trochanter). There are no figures illustrating the male palps in ventral view, and it remains unclear where the embolus originates in any of the species except for the generotype and P. aloha Forster, 1959. The leg formula varies among males and can be either 1423 or 1243.

Pseudanapis yasunica sp. n. (Fig. 1A–E)

https://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:8A50433E-6489-47A7-9BEA-99CE27465E95

Type material. Holotype ♂ (USNM), ECUADOR: Orellana Province: Tiputini Biodiversity Station, nr Yasuní National Park, transect – T/1 Sta.1, 00°37'55"S 76°08'39"W, 06.II.1999, 220–250 m (T.L. Erwin et al.).

Etymology. The specific epithet is an adjective, referring to Yasuní National Park.

Diagnosis. The new species can be distinguished from all congeners by the shape of the embolus, which is strongly extended from the tegulum and bent at a right angle (Fig. 1D; vs. the embolus not stretched and adjoining the tegulum). Compared to the only congener known from Ecuador, P. domingo Platnick & Shadab, 1979, the new species differs in the shape of the embolus, a larger and longer distal process of the palpal femur, and a hooked dorsal process of the patella (cf. Fig. 1E and Platnick & Shadab, 1979: fig. 53).

Description. ¾ Male. Habitus as in Fig. 1A. Total length 0.93. Carapace 0.40 long, 0.30 wide, 0.20 high. Eyes subequal in size, diameter of each ca. 0.06. Carapace, chelicerae, maxillae, labium and sternum orangish brown (Fig. 1A–B). Carapace covered with round pits. Sternum slightly convex. Legs slightly lighter than carapace, without annulations or modifications. Abdomen light beige, with dorsal scutum covering ca. 0.8 of dorsum length, epigastral scutum ca. half of venter length, inframammilary scutum circular, wider ventrally; side of abdomen with pair of long wrinkles and ventral scuta (Fig. 1C). Spinnerets uniformly pale beige. Measurements of legs: I: 1.07 (0.32, 0.13, 0.25, 0.13, 0.24); II: 0.98 (0.29, 0.12, 0.21, 0.13, 0.23); III: 0.86 (0.25, 0.10, 0.18, 0.12, 0.21); IV: 1.06 (0.32, 0.12, 0.26, 0.14, 0.22).

Palp as in Fig. 1D–E; trochanter (Tr) long, twice longer than wide; femur (Fe) 1.5 times longer than trochanter with two processes stretched at right angle, proximal one longer than femur’s diameter, distal one smaller, about diameter of femur and thinner than proximal; patella (Pt) triangular, dorsal angle with kind of small bill, distally very wide, 1.25 times longer than patella long and wider than femur long; tibia (Ti) small, as long as wide; cymbium oval; bulb oval; sperm duct (Sd) long, almost straight at retrolateral side of tegulum, making strong loop at anterior part of tegulum and another contra loop forming S-shaped figure (Fig 1E); conductor, if present, indistinct; embolus with wide triangular base (Eb) lacking distinct border with tegulum; tip of embolus (Et) needle-shaped, bent at right angle from base.

Figure 1. Pseudanapis yasunica sp. n., holotype ♂. A. Habitus, lateral view; B. Prosoma, ventral view; C. Abdomen, ventral view; D. Palp, retrolateral view; E. Palp, ventral view. Abbreviations: Eb – embolus base, Et – embolus tip, Fe – femur, Pt – patella, Sd – sperm duct, Ti – tibia, Tr – trochanter.

Female. Unknown.

Note. The new species has the same number and position of palpal setae as in the generotype.

Distribution. Known only from the type locality in Orellana, eastern Ecuador.

Family Hersiliidae Thorell, 1869

Genus Neotama M. Baehr & B. Baehr, 1993

Type species. Tama variata Pocock, 1899 from Sri Lanka.

Comments. A small genus comprising nine species distributed in Indonesia (1 species), India (2 species), Sri Lanka (1 species), South Africa (1 species), and Southern USA and the Neotropics (4 species). It has been well revised by Baehr and Baehr (1993) and Rheims and Brescovit (2004). Only one species, Neotama mexicana (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1893), has been recorded from Ecuador (Rheims & Brescovit, 2004).

Neotama obatala Rheims & Brescovit, 2004 (Fig. 2A–C)

Neotama obatala Rheims & Brescovit, 2004: 215, figs 17, 74–80 (♂♀).

Material. ECUADOR: Orellana Province: 1♂ (USNM), Tiputini Biodiversity Station, nr Yasuní National Park, transect – T/1 Sta.1, 00°37'55"S 76°08'39"W, 06.II.1999, 220–250 m (T.L. Erwin et al.); 1♀ (USNM), same locality and collectors, 05.II.1999.

Comments. This species was described as a part of a revision of Neotropical hersiliids, and prior to the present contribution, known only from a single taxonomic publication (Rheims & Brescovit, 2004).

Distribution. Peru, Brazil, Guyana, and Ecuador (new record).

Genus Ypypuera Rheims & Brescovit, 2004

Type species. Tama crucifera Vellard, 1924 from Brazil.

Comments. The genus currently comprises three species distributed from Venezuela to Argentina (WSC, 2024). Among them, only Y. esquisita Rheims & Brescovit, 2004, known only from females, was described from Ecuador. In the male palp of Y. crucifera illustrated here, we noticed modifications in the form of a prolateral outgrowth of the cymbium (Cy) and a corresponding pit (Tp) on the tibia. Although these characters have not been previously documented within the Hersiliidae, they apparently occur in many species of the family (C.A. Rheims, pers. comm.).

Figure 2. Neotama obatala Rheims & Brescovit, 2004, male palp (A, B) and epigyne (C). A, C. Ventral view; B. Retrolateral view.

Ypypuera crucifera (Vellard, 1924) (Figs 3B–D, 4A–D)

Ypypuera crucifera: Rheims & Brescovit, 2004: 221, figs 7–10, 13–14, 19–20, 81–87 (♂♀). For a list of six taxonomic references, see WSC (2024).

Material. ECUADOR: Orellana Province: 2♂♂ (USNM), Tiputini Biodiversity Station, nr Yasuní National Park, transect – T/1 Sta.1, 00°37'55"S 76°08'39"W, 07.II.1999, 220–250 m (T.L. Erwin et al.).

Comments. The male palp illustrated here differs from those illustrated by Rheims & Brescovit (2004) in several aspects: the more elongate basal portion of the tegular apophysis (Ta), the more elongate tegulum (length/width approximately 1.21 vs. 1.18), and the relatively thinner and longer embolus (Em) (cf. Fig. 4A and Rheims & Brescovit, 2004: fig. 84). These differences are considered intraspecific variations (C.A. Rheims, pers. comm.).

Distribution. Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Paraguay, Peru, and Ecuador (new record).

Figure 3. Male of Ypypuera crucifera (Vellard, 1924) (B–D), and female of Y. vittata (Simon, 1887) (A, E, F). A, B. Habitus, dorsal view; C. Prosoma, frontal view; D. Habitus, lateral view; E. Epigyne, ventral view; F. Idem, dorsal view. Abbreviation: Se – septum.

Figure 4. Ypypuera crucifera (Vellard, 1924), male palp. A. Ventral view; B. Anteroprolateral view; C. Prolateral view; D. Retrolateral view. Abbreviations: Cy – cymbial prolateral outgrowth, Em – embolus, Ta – tegular apophysis, Tp – tibial pit.

Ypypuera vittata (Simon, 1887) (Figs 3B–D, 4A–D)

Ypypuera vittata: Rheims & Brescovit, 2004: 223, figs 21–22, 35, 88–94 (♂♀). For a list of three taxonomic references, see WSC (2024).

Material. ECUADOR: Orellana Province: 1♀ (USNM), Tiputini Biodiversity Station, nr Yasuní National Park, transect – T/1 Sta.1, 00°37'55"S 76°08'39"W, 05.II.1999, 220–250 m (T.L. Erwin et al.).

Comments. The epigyne illustrated here differs from that illustrated by Rheims & Brescovit (2004) in copulatory ducts more widely spaced and a more prominent septum (Se) (cf. Fig. 3E–F and Rheims & Brescovit, 2004: fig. 94). These differences are considered intraspecific variations (C.A. Rheims, pers. comm.).

Distribution. Brazil, Peru, Suriname, and Ecuador (new record).

Family Symphytognathidae Hickman, 1931

Genus Anapistula Gertsch, 1941

Type species. Anapistula secreta Gertsch, 1941 from Panama.

Comments. This genus comprises 28 species distributed in Oceania (5 species), East and Southeast Asia (4 species), China (5 species), Portugal (1 species), Seychelles (1 species), Central and West Africa (2 species), and southern United States and the Neotropics (10 species). Only one species is currently known from Ecuador (Dupérré & Tapia, 2017).

Anapistula tiputiana sp. n. (Fig. 5A–D)

https://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D507D7ED-C789-4D4A-B80E-83A9D5517846

Type material. Holotype ♀ (USNM), ECUADOR: Orellana Province: Tiputini Biodiversity Station, nr Yasuní National Park, transect – T/1 Sta.1, 00°37'55"S 76°08'39"W, 05.II.1999, 220–250 m (T.L. Erwin et al.).

Figure 5. Anapistula tiputiana sp. n., holotype female (A–D), and A. equatoriana Dupérré & Tapia, 2017 (E). A. Habitus, dorsal view; B, D, E.  Epigyne, dorsal view; C. Abdomen, anteroventral. E. Reproduced from Dupérré & Tapia (2017). Abbreviations: Ld – lateral ducts, Md – median duct, Re – receptacle.

Etymology. The specific epithet is an adjective, referring to the type locality of the new species.

Diagnosis. The new species differs from A. equatoriana Dupérré & Tapia, 2017, the only other species of Anapistula known from Ecuador, in the shape of the epigyne: the lateral ducts (Ld) form an almost horizontal line (vs. V-shaped), the median duct (Md) is longer, and the receptacles are more widely spaced (cf. Fig. 5B–D and 5E). Additionally, the new species can be differentiated from other Neotropical congeners by the trajectory of lateral ducts, and the proportions of receptacles relative to the length of these ducts.

Description. ¾ Female. Habitus as in Fig. 5A. Total length 0.50. Carapace 0.24 long, 0.22 wide. Eyes: four in two diads. Body completely pale. Measurements of leg I: 0.67 (0.18, 0.09, 0.13, 0.11, 0.16). Additional information cannot be provided due to the damage inflicted on the specimen during the maceration of the epigyne.

Epigyne as in Fig. 5B–D; receptacles span ca. 1.57 times wider than length of epigynal plate; receptacles spaced by ca. 3 radii (1.5 diameters); lateral ducts (Ld) almost straight and forming horizontal line, forming a posterior bent close to receptacles.

Male. Unknown.

Distribution. Known only from the type locality in Orellana, eastern Ecuador.

DISCUSSION

Ecuador is divided into four main natural biogeographic regions: the northern and southwestern Amazon (Oriente), the northern and south-central Andes (Sierra), the Pacific coastal plain (Costa), and the Galápagos Islands (Brito & Borges, 2015). The two new species described in this paper, Anapistula tiputiana sp. n. and Pseudanapis yasunica sp. n., are the second known species of their respective genera from Ecuador and the first ones from the Ecuadorian Amazon. The other species known from Ecuador, A. equatoriana and P. domingo, are found in drastically different habitats in the Andes and the coastal region, respectively (Platnick & Shadab, 1979; Dupérré & Tapia, 2017). The three hersiliid species reported here for the first time from Ecuador are all widely distributed in South America, so their occurrence in the Ecuadorian Amazon was not unexpected.

The specimens studied represent only a small portion of a very large series collected by the late Terry L. Erwin and his colleagues, which is housed at the USNM. Several new species and new records have been previously published from the material collected in this locality or the nearby Yasuní National Park (e.g., Logunov & Marusik, 2003; Platnick & Dupérré, 2011; Platnick et al., 2013a, 2013b; Platnick & Berniker, 2014; Ott et al., 2019), and there are at least 18 spider species (of Salticidae and Oonopidae) that have their type localities in Tiputini.

AUTHOR′S CONTRIBUTION

The authors confirm their contribution to the paper as follows: A. Zamani, Y. Marusik: Conceptualization; AZ: Microscopic photography; AZ, YM: Writing – original draft; AZ: Writing – review and editing. The authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

FUNDING

The contribution of Alireza Zamani was supported by a grant from the Turku University Foundation (ID 081820).

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIAL

The specimens listed in this study are deposited in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC and are available from the curator, upon request.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

This study only included plants and arthropod material, and all required ethical guidelines for the treatment and use of animals were strictly adhered to in accordance with international, national, and institutional regulations. No human participants were involved in any studies conducted by the authors for this article.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Yuri M. Marusik thanks Seppo Koponen for arranging his stay in Turku. Both authors are grateful to the subject editor for diligently handling this manuscript and to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback and valuable suggestions. We would like to extend our sincere gratitude to Dr. Cristina Anne Rheims (Laboratory of Zoological Collections (LCZ), Instituto Butantan, Brazil) for her invaluable comments and insightful feedback on our manuscript, which have significantly enhanced the quality of our work..

REFERENCES

Baehr, M. & Baehr, B. (1993) The Hersiliidae of the Oriental Region including New Guinea. Taxonomy, phylogeny, zoogeography (Arachnida, Araneae). Spixiana, 19 (Suppl.), 1–95.

Brito, G. & Borges, A. (2015) A checklist of the scorpions of Ecuador (Arachnida: Scorpiones), with notes on the distribution and medical significance of some species. Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases, 21, 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40409-015-0023-x

Dupérré, N. (2023) Araneae (spiders) of South America: a synopsis of current knowledge. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 50 (1), 3–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2021.20227

Dupérré, N. & Tapia, E. (2017) On some minuscule spiders (Araneae: Theridiosomatidae, Symphytognathidae) from the Chocó region of Ecuador with the description of ten new species. Zootaxa, 4341 (3), 375–399.

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4341.3.3

Dupérré, N. & Tapia, E. (2023) Description of eleven new species in the Scytodoidea group (Araneae: Drymusidae and Scytodidae) from mainland Ecuador. Journal of Arachnology, 51 (3), 258–286. https://doi.org/10.1636/JoA-S-22-002

Forster, R.R. (1958) Spiders of the family Symphytognathidae from North and South America. American Museum Novitates, 1885, 1–14.

Logunov, D.V. & Marusik, Y.M. (2003) Taxonomic and faunistic notes on Chinoscopus Simon, 1900 and Lyssomanes Hentz, 1845 from the Neotropical region (Araneae, Salticidae). Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society, 12, 415–424.

Ott, R., Ubick, D., Bonaldo, A.B., Brescovit, A.D. & Harvey, M.S. (2019) A revision of the New World goblin spider genus Cinetomorpha Simon, 1892 revalidated from Gamasomorpha Karsch, 1881 (Araneae, Oonopidae, Oonopinae). Zootaxa, 4641 (1), 1–152. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4641.1.1

Platnick, N.I. & Berniker, L. (2014) The Neotropical goblin spiders of the new genus Reductoonops (Araneae, Oonopidae). American Museum Novitates, 3811, 1–75. https://doi.org/10.1206/3811.1

Platnick, N.I. & Dupérré, N. (2011) The Andean goblin spiders of the new genera Paradysderina and Semidysderina (Araneae, Oonopidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 364, 1–121. https://doi.org/10.1206/771.1

Platnick, N.I. & Shadab, M.U. (1979) A review of the spider genera Anapisona and Pseudanapis (Araneae, Anapidae). American Museum Novitates, 2672, 1–20.

Platnick, N.I., Berniker, L. & Bonaldo, A.B. (2013a) The South American goblin spider genera Dysderina and Tridysderina (Araneae, Oonopidae). American Museum Novitates, 3772, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1206/3772.2

Platnick, N.I., Dupérré, N., Berniker, L. & Bonaldo, A.B. (2013b) The goblin spider genera Prodysderina, Aschnaoonops, and Bidysderina (Araneae, Oonopidae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 373, 1–102. https://doi.org/10.1206/822.1

Rheims, C.A. & Brescovit, A.D. (2004) Revision and cladistic analysis of the spider family Hersiliidae (Arachnida, Araneae) with emphasis on Neotropical and Nearctic species. Insect Systematics & Evolution, 35 (2), 189–239. https://doi.org/10.1163/187631204788912355

WSC (2024) World Spider Catalog. Version 24.5. Natural History Museum Bern, online at http://wsc.nmbe.ch  [Accessed 12 March 2024] https://doi.org/10.24436/2

Zamani, A., Vahtera, V., Sääksjärvi, I.E., & Carvalho, L.S. (2022) The effect of sampling bias on evaluating the diversity and distribution patterns of Iranian spiders (Arachnida: Araneae). Diversity, 15 (1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/d15010022