Volume 7, Issue 4 (2004)                   CLR 2004, 7(4): 123-140 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghari Seyed Fatemi S M. The Right to self - Determination and Monitoring Public Election: Guaranteed Monitoring Against Restricted Monitoring. CLR 2004; 7 (4) :123-140
URL: http://clr.modares.ac.ir/article-20-452-en.html
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University
Abstract:   (10477 Views)
Seyed Mohammad Ghari Seyed Fatemi Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University  In this article the issue of monitoring public election has been examined form the view point of the right to self-determination. Analyzing moral foundations of individuals right to participate in public election as a manifestation of the right to self - determination in social life, the right to elect and the right to be elected have been considered as two sides of a coin. Moral and legal restrictions of these two rights also have been discussed in this article. Distinguishing between "being right and having right", it is argued that in the "level of being right" Qur'anic teachings recognize "the right to be wrong" as a basic moral right. of all the above theoretical framework, the necessity of a guaranteed monitoring system rather than a restricted one (i.e.,» monitor that restricts the right to vote). Is suggested A justified monitoring system, therefore, is the one according to which the right of individuals to determine their own social affairs via public election is institutionally guaranteed.
Full-Text [PDF 3291 kb]   (3569 Downloads)    

Received: 2012/04/30 | Accepted: 2012/04/30 | Published: 2012/04/30

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.